#Avid pinnacle studio wiki free#

IВ do not edit every day, and my memory - never good in the first place - isВ getting worse as I age. The truth is that both methods are valid.

#Avid pinnacle studio wiki free#

The new artists should be free to create without having to bother with thinking about the technical details.Д«roadcast standards are so yesterday - SMPTE standards should be destroyed once and for all.

Avid's end goal should be to remove all the technological barriers that get in the way of creating content. Progressive RGB video only, no 601 or 709 this just adds more confusion. For that matter interlaced video and the complexities of field order should be eliminated as well. 'Are frames from my video being dropped? Why?' If Avid eliminated drop frame timecode, editors would be free of the burden of understanding the the difference between NDF and DF. This is huge point of point of confusion for the new guard. Avid should stop allowing drop frame timecome in their NLE's. System resources could be reallocated to speed up the process of preparing a video for youtube. Removing these useless technical tools will free the minds of the new guard allowing them to create bold innovative content. Perhaps a simple green light to indicate the presence of audio is all that is needed. This clutter gets in the way of the new creative thinkers that are changing the editing world. Regarding audio, the audio meters and mixer clutter the Avid interface. We should remove the waveform/vector scopes from Avid NLE's.

The 'new guard' can't be bothered with such things. Nobody uses waveform vector scopes anymore. Their old way of thinking is useless in today's market. Let's move on from the 'dinosaurs', the 'pioneers', the 'old guard'. But I have certainly come to realize the difficult position Avid is in. At some point Avid needs to make the break and say 'here is our new tool for the future.' and get on with it before they lose all the new editors coming up through the ranks. Sooner or later, that stretch between 'classic versions' for the old guard and new features/interface will become too far. Color correction and two separate products.there is much for Avid to do.Д«ut, as much as Avid needs to do this, it has to be on guard for the old guard.but then they lose the 'new guard' to other more 'sexy' options. But, Avid needs to re-vamp it's workflow and interface. Many of the 'old guard' resist anything that changes their established workflow.even if learning the new tool or workflow would actually increase productivity in the long run. There tends to be a resistance from old guard and 'pioneers' when ways are introduced to reduce the time and skills needed to accomplish tasks.Д®xactly.